## Sign up to take part

Registered users can ask their own questions, contribute to discussions, and be part of the Community!

This website uses cookies. By clicking OK, you consent to the use of cookies. Read our cookie policy.

Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results forย

Survey banner

Share your feedback on the Dataiku documentation with this 5 min survey. Thanks! TAKE THE SURVEY

Registered users can ask their own questions, contribute to discussions, and be part of the Community!

- Community
- ยป
- New York User Group
- ยป
- New York Forum
- ยป

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Logistic Regression

Hello all,

I posted a question in the community and Maureen responded, but then left me with more questions as I was confused, but she has not been able to respond again and I was hoping someone here could elaborate for me.

Here is my question:

Thank you @MaureenP. I appreciate your explanation. I have not heard of the Log of the Odds ratio before. I presume that this number is similar, in that a variables log of the Odds Ration if positive, is the % of the increase in the likelihood of 1 or True and a negative is the % decrease in the likelihood of 1 or True.

In the attached example, does it read that there is a 60% increased likelihood in retention for that variable and a 30% decreased likelihood in retention for the next variable.

Here is the link to the my reply to her https://community.dataiku.com/t5/Using-Dataiku-DSS/Logistic-regression-output/m-p/12756#M5658

Thank you so much for any help. I am still learning the differences between Dataiku and SPSS/Excel.

โ

Solutions shown first - Read whole discussion

3 Replies

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi @cwentz ,

Thank you for reaching out.

The screenshot that you sent looks like the regression coefficients tab.

Logisitic regression coefficients are a bit tricky to interpret. I'll try to give a simple explanation. In order to understand the log of the odds, let us first define the relation between the probability and the odds:

The odds (in favor) of an event or a proposition is the ratio of the probability that the event will happen to the probability that the event will not happen

For example, the odds that a day in the week is a weekend day are 2:5, where 2 is the number of weekend days and 5 is the others. This can be translated in terms of probability to 2 / (2 + 5) = 2 / 7. In general if the odds ratio is ** S:F** and the probability is

The log of the odds in the previous example is log(2/5). In the general case, if we define the probability as

Now coming back to the interpretation of the logistic regression, the coefficients that you see are indeed the contribution of a variable to the prediction's log of the odds

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

@MehdiH Thank you!

I do understand this a little more, however, without doing any math and just looking at the coefficients tab, could it be said that the number is a weight or amount, negative or positive, to the contribution to the event happening? I'm trying to understand how to word this for the audience it is intended for, the non-data person.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

The "handwaving" explanation would be that the coefficients measure the contribution of the variable in the target probability.

The higher the coefficient the more it increases the probability.

However, you need to do a bit of math (basically ** exp(coef)/(1 + exp(coef)) **) to get an approximate idea of the influence of the coefficient in the probability