Sign up to take part
Registered users can ask their own questions, contribute to discussions, and be part of the Community!
Welcome to Conundrum 23!
This week let’s take a look at some super light data prep and visualisation in the wonderful world of chess.
Attached is data about a collection of chess games - included is the ID of the players, the victor of each game, and a few other statistics.
Can you display the top 10 players by raw win:loss ratio and display their prowess visually?
@MichaelG and others who are reading.
Thanks for this week's conundrum.
This conundrum is using an ambiguous term, or a term that I do not understand how to calculate.
raw win:loss ratio
If a player played 1 game and lost 0 as many of the participants in this data did. That produces an undefined value for the ratio win/loss, often displayed as a positive Infinity. There are 4381 players who have no losses in the data. (if you drop draws.) All would be calculated as an infinite win/loss ratio.
However, then how do we pick a top 10 from this list? All have the same infinite score. We might want to celebrate a top 10 pick based on the number of wins. So showing the player who had 24 wins with no loss might get the #1 position. A then the player with 18 wins and no loss...
However what about a player that has 45 wins and 1 loss? They made 46 attempts and have a ratio of 45/1 which is lower than the infinity scored by a player who had 1 win and 0 losses. I would think that the player having 45 wins and 1 loss is likely a much better player than the "one-win wonders" in our dataset.
Can anyone point me to a place that produces a calculation to deal with this kind of issue?
@MichaelG can you clarify what you intended by the
top 10 extract the top players by raw win:loss ratio
P.S. What do folks think about dealing with the 950 games that are "draws"? At this point in time, I've dropped those games because they are neither a win nor a loss. We could also give each player .5 wins and .5 losses for the draw.
Looking forward to hearing what others think about the challenge. Please jump in with your ideas.
Thanks for the question/input!
I agree those players with a infinite win/loss ratio present a problem for how I formulated the conundrum - perhaps raw wins would be a better metric. But then that would bias in favour of those plays who played a lot of games - since 10 wins 5 losses would rank lower than 20 wins and 50 losses.
Perhaps a combined score that requires a given number of games played and then awards a value based on the number of wins less the number of losses? Any other ideas?
On what exactly I intended by that I'm afraid that was just a mistype on my part - I meant what it now says:
top 10 players by raw win:loss ratio
Thanks for pointing that out!